61.
Suit against which of the following is NOT barred by period of limitation?
A
Trustee
B
Tenant
C
Debtor
D
Partner
Loading practice questions
74 practice sets · Page 4 of 4
Suit against which of the following is NOT barred by period of limitation?
Trustee
Tenant
Debtor
Partner
Identify the correct statement
The Section 10 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable only to the situation where the appeal is already filed.
The Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable only to the situation where the suit or appeal is already filed and pending for disposal.
The Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable only to the situation where suit is to be filed.
None of the above
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below in the list.The given list corresponds to the Law of Limitation.
A. Suit in forma pauperis | 1. Section 13
---|---
B. Proceedings stayed by an injunction | 2. Section 14
C. Defect in jurisdiction | 3. Section 15
D. Effect of fraud on limitation | 4. Section 17
A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
A-1, B-3. C-2, D-4
C-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
What is the period of limitation for any other application for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in this Division?
one year
two years
three years
five years
Fill in the blanks with respect to the Limitation Act, 1963:
Where the property over which a right is claimed under Section 25(1) belongs to the Government that sub-section shall be read as if for the words “twenty years" the words _________ were substituted.
ten years
thirty years
fifty years
none of the above
A judgment was passed on 10/07/2002, and the decree was prepared on 25/7/2002. An application for certified copy was made on 11/7/2002 and the certified copy was ready on 01/08/2002 and the delivery of certified copy was taken on 05/08/ 2002. Under Section 12, the period of limitation to be excluded is:
11/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
11/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
10/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
10/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
The statutes of limitation are premised on which fundamental legal maxim?
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt
Actori incumbit onus probandi
Frustra probatur quod probatum non relevant
Nemo potest esse tenens et dominus
Under Limitation act, Exclusion of time of proceeding bona fide in Court without jurisdiction is stipulated in:
Section 14
Section 16
Section 15
Section 13
According to the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963, match correctly the suit and article thereof in which period of limitation is prescribed -
Suit | Article wherein period of limitation is prescribed
---|---
(1) | For money payable for money lent | (a) | Article 54
(2) | For arrears of rent | (b) | Article 19
(3) | For specific performance of a contract | (c) | Article 52
(4) | For forclosure by a mortgagee | (d) | Article 63
(1) - (b), (2) - (c), (3) - (d), (4) - (a)
(1) - (b), (2) - (c), (3) - (a), (4) - (d)
(1) - (c), (2) - (d), (3) - (a), (4) - (b)
(1) - (d), (2) - (b), (3) - (a), (4) - (c)
The limitation period for initiating action where no period of limitation is prescribed anywhere is
Three years from the date on which the right to apply accrues
One year from the date on which the right to apply accrues
Anytime from the date on which the right to apply accrues
None of the above
What is the period of limitation for any other application for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in this Division?
one year
two years
three years
five years
Continuing breaches and torts is provided under which section of the Limitation Act, 1963?
Section 20
Section 21
Section 22
Section 23
Fill in the blanks with respect to the Limitation Act, 1963:
Once time has begun to run, ___________________ stop/s it.
no subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application
a subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application shall
a subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application may
none of the above
Under the provisions of sub-section 2 of Section18 of the Limitation Act, oral evidence of the date of acknowledgment is permissible if the acknowledgment:
Is dated
Is undated
Date in acknowledgment is altered
All the above