1.
In the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, one of the major reasons the Bombay High Court rejected the prosecution's case was:
A
The confessions and witness statements were recorded after unexplained delays and raised suspicion of coercion, undermining procedural fairness
B
The High Court concluded that all forensic laboratories gave identical results, suggesting manipulation
C
The presence of explosives was conclusively proved, but technicalities prevented conviction
D
The accused withdrew their alibis during trial, weakening the defence case