81.
Delay in filing the suit _______.
A
Can be condoned under Order VII, Rule 6. C.P.C.
B
Cannot be condoned
C
Can be condoned under Section 3, Limitation Act
D
Can be condoned under Section 5, Limitation Act
Loading practice questions
Browse topic-based Limitation act practice sets.
115 practice sets · Page 5 of 6
Delay in filing the suit _______.
Can be condoned under Order VII, Rule 6. C.P.C.
Cannot be condoned
Can be condoned under Section 3, Limitation Act
Can be condoned under Section 5, Limitation Act
As per section 13 of the Limitation Act, in cases where an application for leave to sue or appeal as a pauper has been made and rejected, how is the period of limitation for the suit or appeal computed?
The period of limitation is extended by the duration during which the applicant has been prosecuting the application for such leave in good faith
The period of limitation is not affected by the rejection of the application for leave to sue or appeal as a pauper
The period of limitation is reduced by the duration during which the applicant has been prosecuting the application for such leave
The period of limitation is extended only if the applicant pays the court fees prescribed for the suit or appeal
In which of the recent cases has the Supreme Court held that 'period spent bonafide prosecuting proceedings in wrong forum is to be excluded in computing period of IImitation?
A.P. Power Co-ordination Committee v. Lanco Kondapalli Power Limited (2016)
B.S. Sheshagiri Setty v. State of Karnataka (2016)
Sundaram Finance v. Noorjahan Beevi (2016)
Standard Chartered Bank v. Andhra Bank Financial Services (2016)
A counter-claim shall be deemed under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to have been instituted :-
On the same day as the suit in which counter-claim is made, was filed
On the day on which the counter- claim is made in Court
Either (1) or (2) whichever is beneficial to the defendant
Either (1) or (2) whichever is beneficial to the plaintiff
Section 23 of the Limitation Act deals with:
Suits for compensation for acts not actionable without special damage
Suits for compensation for acts causing general damage
Suits for compensation for acts causing immediate damage
Suits for compensation for acts causing mental anguish
In ICICI Bank Ltd v. Trishla Apparels Pvt Ltd (2015), what did the Madras High Court emphasize regarding suits barred by time?(Limitation Act)
The court has discretion to entertain suits even if they are barred by time, regardless of the opposing party's plea.
The court is not obligated to dismiss suits barred by time unless the opposing party raises the plea.
The court is duty-bound to dismiss suits barred by time, even if the opposing party does not raise the plea.
Suits barred by time cannot be dismissed by the court if the opposing party does not raise the plea.
Period of Limitation for suits relating to accounts is
3 years
7 years
1 year
5 years
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below in the list.The given list corresponds to the Law of Limitation.
A. Suit in forma pauperis | 1. Section 13
---|---
B. Proceedings stayed by an injunction | 2. Section 14
C. Defect in jurisdiction | 3. Section 15
D. Effect of fraud on limitation | 4. Section 17
A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
A-1, B-3. C-2, D-4
C-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
What is the period of limitation for a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), to have the legal representative of a deceased plaintiff or appellant or of a deceased defendant or respondent, made a party?
Thirty days
forty-five days
sixty days
ninety days
A judgment was passed on 10/07/2002, and the decree was prepared on 25/7/2002. An application for certified copy was made on 11/7/2002 and the certified copy was ready on 01/08/2002 and the delivery of certified copy was taken on 05/08/ 2002. Under Section 12, the period of limitation to be excluded is:
11/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
11/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
10/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
10/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
Suit against which of the following is NOT barred by period of limitation?
Trustee
Tenant
Debtor
Partner
Identify the correct statement
The Section 10 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable only to the situation where the appeal is already filed.
The Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable only to the situation where the suit or appeal is already filed and pending for disposal.
The Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable only to the situation where suit is to be filed.
None of the above
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below in the list.The given list corresponds to the Law of Limitation.
A. Suit in forma pauperis | 1. Section 13
---|---
B. Proceedings stayed by an injunction | 2. Section 14
C. Defect in jurisdiction | 3. Section 15
D. Effect of fraud on limitation | 4. Section 17
A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
A-1, B-3. C-2, D-4
C-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
Which of the following section of the Limitation Act, 1963 gives recognition to the concept of 'Adverse Possession' ?
22
24
26
27
What is the period of limitation for any other application for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in this Division?
one year
two years
three years
five years
A stayed in the hotel of B for one week. He organised a party for his friends on 01.11.2014 the bill of which amounted to Rs. 40,000/-, He vacated his room on 05.11.2014 and settled all his bills except the bill of the party. B can sue A for the payment of Rs. 40,000/- within:
1 year from 01.11.2014
1 year from 05.11.2014
3 years from 01.11.2014
3 years from 05.11.2014
Fill in the blanks with respect to the Limitation Act, 1963:
Where the property over which a right is claimed under Section 25(1) belongs to the Government that sub-section shall be read as if for the words “twenty years" the words _________ were substituted.
ten years
thirty years
fifty years
none of the above
In the computation of the period for claiming an easement, when will the time during which the easement was enjoyed be excluded?
If the easement has been enjoyed for more than twenty years
If the land or water has been held under an interest for life or in terms of years exceeding three years
If the claim is resisted by the person entitled to the land or water within three years after the determination of the interest or term
If the easement is claimed by the person who originally granted the interest or term
A judgment was passed on 10/07/2002, and the decree was prepared on 25/7/2002. An application for certified copy was made on 11/7/2002 and the certified copy was ready on 01/08/2002 and the delivery of certified copy was taken on 05/08/ 2002. Under Section 12, the period of limitation to be excluded is:
11/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
11/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
10/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
10/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
The statutes of limitation are premised on which fundamental legal maxim?
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt
Actori incumbit onus probandi
Frustra probatur quod probatum non relevant
Nemo potest esse tenens et dominus