Pigeon Hole theory was proposed by - Practice (English) | ObjectiveMcq

Loading practice questions

A focused practice platform for competitive-exam MCQs, subject wise, topic wise practice, and current affairs revision.

Exams

SSC CGL
UPSC CSE PRELIMS
IBPS PO
RRB NTPC
CDS

Subjects

Mathematics
Physics
General Knowledge
English
Reasoning

Resources

Current Affairs
Search MCQs
Practice Sets

Company

About Us
Contact
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Disclaimer
Copyright

Practice library for exams, subjects, and daily revision. For learning purposes only.

© 2026 ObjectiveMcq.ComAll rights reserved

Pigeon Hole theory was proposed by - Practice (English) | ObjectiveMcq

PracticeLaw Of TortGeneralPigeon Hole theory was proposed by...

General Law Of TortEasy

548 views

Pigeon Hole theory was proposed by

Correct Answer: B — Salmond

Explanation:

The Pigeon-hole Theory of Tort Law was given by Salmon, a British jurist. This theory describes how the law of tort works in cases where a plaintiff suffers multiple injuries due to the negligence of the defendant.

Related Practice

The principle of "Ubi jus ibi idem remedium" was recognized in
Gloucstershire grammar School Case is a leading case to explain the
The rule "You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbor" was propounded in -
'Qui facit per aluim facit per se' means:
Contributory negligence means
English case Ryland V/s. Fletcher laid down a very important rule
The tort of deceit owes its origin to -
The Supreme Court observed, Where an enterprise is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity and harm results to anyone on account of an accident in the operation of such hazardous or inherently dangerous activity resulting, for example, in escape of toxic gas the enterprise is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-a-vis the tortious principle of strict liability. In such a case, the measure of compensation must be correlated to the magnitude and capacity of the enterprise because such compensation must have a deterrent effect. The larger and more prosperous the enterprise, the greater must be the amount of compensation payable by it for the harm caused on account of an accident in the carrying on of the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity by the enterprise.

Name the case.