ObjectiveMcq
Print Protected
This page is protected for print. Use the website to view the content.
According to the ruling in Collector and Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner v. Darshan Singh and others (AIR 1999), what stance did the court take regarding the non-availability of the case file to the State counsel or Panel lawyer?
Correct Answer: B — Non-availability of the case file does not constitute a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.
In Collector and Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner v. Darshan Singh and others (AIR 1999) , the court held that the non-availability of the case file to the State counsel or Panel lawyer is not considered a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.