विशिष्ट राहत अधिनियम की धारा 26 गलती या धोखाधड़ी की खोज - Practice (Hindi)

Loading practice questions

A focused practice platform for competitive-exam MCQs, subject wise, topic wise practice, and current affairs revision.

Practice library for exams, subjects, and daily revision. For learning purposes only.

विशिष्ट राहत अधिनियम की धारा 26 गलती या धोखाधड़ी की खोज - Practice (Hindi) | ObjectiveMcq

PracticeSRASpecific Performance Of Contractsविशिष्ट राहत अधिनियम की धारा 26 गलत...

945 views

विशिष्ट राहत अधिनियम की धारा 26 गलती या धोखाधड़ी की खोज के लिए समय सीमा तय करती है:

Correct Answer: D — कोई भी समय सीमा निर्धारित नहीं

Explanation:

विशिष्ट राहत अधिनियम की धारा 26 बताती है किउपकरण को कब ठीक किया जा सकता है।

If a person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he may file a suit to recover possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act within:
Against whom can a suit can not be brought under Section 6?
A temporary injunction continues-
How is the fee for the expert's services determined according to Section 14A?
A mutual mistake of the parties in an instrument, which does not express their real intention, can be got rectified by either party to the instrument;
A plaintiff files a suit for permanent injunction. Under Section 40 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963:
Injunction to perform negative agreement is laid down in which section of the specific Relief Act:
A temporary injunction under Section 37 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 can be granted by the court: